Freeman’s Reach Archimedes Screw Update: December 2018

28 Dec

We are sorry to have to report that the trial with the acoustic screen and strobe lighting did not deter migratory fish entering the entering the base of the screw during lifts of water in 2018. Consequently this equipment, installed by Fish Guidance Systems, Southampton, will shortly be removed. Instead DCC propose to install a set of heavy duty flexible “plastic” flaps similar to those used at warehouse entrances and as refrigeration doors. A series of overlapping flaps, one in front of the other, of increasing length will be installed in front of the screw to stop/protect fish jumping into the rotating screw. As river height increase the longer flap will ride up first leaving the screw protected by the shorter flaps behind. It is hoped that this system will be installed by the end of May but a preliminary trial will start as soon as possible. 

WAA are still of the opinion that fine screens are the only permanent solution to the problem but hope we are wrong and that this “plastic screen” will solve the problem; we will see what happens in 2019! 

Interested parties, anglers, council officials and the Environment Agency will continue to monitor the situation closely.

National Salmon Bye-laws update Dec 2018 – Yorkshire and North East

28 Dec

The Environment Agency’s national salmon and sea trout byelaws have been confirmed by Defra for England but are awaiting Scotland’s confirmation decision to become law which should be completed soon. This means that the byelaws will become law and come into force on 1 January 2019, and their provisions form part of the regulation of the Yorkshire and North East coastal net fishery for salmon and sea trout.

The key provisions of the national salmon byelaws as provided by the EA are:

Net fishery byelaws

1. An end to all drift netting for salmon and sea trout on the North East coast and the closure of the drift net fishery from January 2019.

2. The closure of the T and J net fishery for salmon, allowing the continuation of the beach net fishery from 2019 on a sea trout only basis.

3. Shorter seasons for each district, depending on the number of salmon typically taken in the net fishery. These are:

District 1:          26 March – 31 May

District 2:          No licences

District 3:          26 March – 30 June

District 4:          26 March  – 31 July

District 5:          26 March  – 31 July

District 6:          26 March – 31 August

District 7:          26 March – 31 August

NB After further consideration and analysis of patterns of salmon and sea trout catches, the proposed length of the netting season for sea trout has been extended by 1 month in Districts 3, 4 and 5 from the seasons proposed in our original byelaw submission.

This decision is based on an assessment of the best and most appropriate balance between providing protection for threatened salmon stocks, and allowing licensed netsmen to continue fishing for sea trout as part of their livelihood.  As our proposed byelaws will require all salmon captured in J nets to be released, and the number of salmon captured in the J net fishery is relatively small, an extension to the netting season for sea trout has been deemed appropriate.

4. We are proposing to run a carefully monitored trial of a modified design of T net in District 1 which is less likely to take salmon in 2019 to determine whether a sea trout only net fishery with a minimal impact on salmon could be extended to the end of August, in line with the current season. We are also considering the potential to undertake a similar trial of a J net comprised entirely of nylon netting (ie with no monofilament in the J comprising the headpiece) in Districts 3-7 if any licensees have an interest in participating in such an opportunity.

The results of any trials which take place next year will be used to inform a decision on whether we licence new designs and specifications of T and J net to fish for sea trout only over the current netting season.  Any new nets would have to have shown they selectively exploit sea trout and do not snag, gill or entangle a significant number of salmon. The introduction of any new net designs would require a new regional fisheries byelaw to be made.

Such a new byelaw would require the Agency to undertake the formal process of consultation on our proposals and presentation of our supporting evidence, followed by an advertisement. A new byelaw would only come into effect once confirmed by the minister.

5. Given our proposals to close the T net fishery for salmon and operate a much shorter netting season, we no longer intend to prohibit T netting in Tyne Conservation Area B at South Shields. Rather, we propose to maintain the two netting stations in this area, allowing net fishing for sea trout only over the shorter season. Similarly, we no longer propose to prohibit T netting in the Boulmer and Amble stell fisheries within Coquet Conservation Area B, but allow T netting to continue for sea trout only over the shorter netting season.

Rod fishery byelaws

No mandatory catch and release for Yorkshire and North East principal salmon rivers – ie Coquet, Tyne, Wear, Tees and Yorks Esk. The Tees has moved from “at risk” to “probably at risk”, so is voluntary catch and release.

Some of the non-principal salmonid rivers – recovering or smaller rivers will have mandatory catch and release. These include the Aln, Waren Burn, Blyth, Wansbeck, Tyne Derwent and the whole of the York’s Ouse system, including the Ure.

We will prevent the take of salmon on rod and line where the stocks are most vulnerable by introducing mandatory catch and release requirements for ‘At Risk’ rivers from 2019, but this does not apply to any North East salmon stocks.

Given the response to the initial consultation we recognise that further regulation could have an impact on angling, our approach for Probably at Risk or better stocks from 2019 will require those rivers to achieve high voluntary catch and release rates of over 90% in the first instance.

Where the 90% catch and release target is not met, we will take decisions on a river-by-river basis whether or not mandatory 100% catch and release should be applied by byelaw. If the current catch and release rate is higher than the proposed rate, then the current rate will be required to be maintained.

National byelaw (Byelaw 13)  dealing with taking of salmon and sea trout on rod and line and the various lures and hook sizes has been withdrawn. This is because responses to the advertisement of the byelaws made a strong case for retaining control of appropriate rod fishing methods at a local level by regional fisheries byelaws, to best reflect local circumstances and fishing practises in different parts of England.

Net Limitation Order review

In parallel with the national salmon byelaws, we are also review the Yorkshire and North East Net Limitation Order 2012 (NLO). The NLO regulates the number of net licences that are issued in the Yorkshire and North East net fishery, and restricts the issue of licences to those netsmen who held the same type of licence in the previous year. As licensees retire or otherwise leave the fishery, their licences are not made available to new entrants to the fishery.  In this way the net fishery decreases over time as existing licensees leave the fishery.

The review has been completed and will report very shortly. The 2012 NLO remains in force for a period of 10 years, and is in operation until December 2022.

The mid-term review presents an opportunity to determine whether the provisions of the current NLO, together with the wider regulation of the net fishery continue to provide an appropriate regulatory framework. Under the 2012 Net Limitation Order, there is no provision for the transfer of nets from existing licensees to any other person. We intend no change to this position.

21 December 2018

River Wear: Durham Sands “Free Stretch”

12 Oct

Below is the Wear Anglers Association (WAA) understanding of the restrictions that are currently in place for fishing the “Free Stretch” at Durham Sands. Restrictions have been put in place for various reasons by the Environmental Agency (EA), Durham City Council (as was) and the City of Durham Freemen. The situation is not clear cut with some water in dispute. The statements below set out the current position as WAA understands it:

  • A national EA bye-law prohibits fishing within a distance of 25 metres upstream and 95 metres downstream of Framwellgate Dam on both banks of the river.
  • A Council bye-law prohibits fishing from the footpath along Framwellgate Waterside on the North, left hand bank. This bye-law runs from Milburngate Bridge downstream to the end of Framwellgate Waterside. It bans fishing from the road and footpath and includes the grassy bank near the steps. We are told by the EA the council bye-law is quite precise and explicit to the area it covers and if anglers wish to access the river via the steps and fish from the river or the small areas that have built up in the river along the years they are free to do so provided they do not encroach upon the EA prohibited area below Framwellgate Weir. This bye-law was introduced on health and safety grounds to protect pedestrians. WAA are very concerned about the dangers to anglers of entering the river at this point particularly when the river is in spate and would  strongly advise against it. 
  • Fishing on the South, right hand bank is much less clear and is disputed; the trustees of the City of Durham Freemen claim to have controlled the fishing rights to this stretch of water since at least the 14th century and closed fishing downstream from Framwellgate Dam to opposite the White House; a distance of approximately 500m. This restriction was put in place for conservation purposes. However 350m of “free fishing” was set aside by The Trustees of the City of Durham Freemen on the South, right hand, bank at the eastern end of the Sands that runs downstream from opposite the White House towards Kepier. Some anglers have challenged the authority of the Freemen of Durham to close this stretch, in that the Freemen do not appear to be able to show any documentary proof they do exercise any control over the fishing. This challenge arises from records of the Commons Commissioners dated from 1860 that assign the Freehold of the Sands Area to the Durham Corporation, now Durham County Council, for the purpose of using it for “public walks and pleasure ground”. To enable this to happen the Freemen, in 1860, agreed to take on the herbage rights. There is no mention of fishing rights. As to whom ultimately owns the fishing rights is a civil matter and not for either the EA or WAA to decide. It is up to individuals to take responsibility for, and make, their own decision as to the wether they believe they can fish this water or not; but anglers must not encroach upon the EA prohibited area below Framwellgate Weir. WAA would hope anglers would act responsibly and follow the restrictions imposed by the Freemen of Durham as these were introduced with the best of intentions for conservation reasons in order to protect migrating salmon and sea trout in this vulnerable part of the river.

Take 3 for the Wear

1 Oct

 

Following the suggestion of a local river Wear angler, the Wear Anglers Association is proud to support a new initiative to help clear up rubbish from in and around the River Wear. The concept is simple: to encourage all anglers to pick up and remove three bit of rubbish each time they go fishing. So after your next fishing trip please pick up three bits of rubbish, throw it in your landing net, and dispose of it either at home or in the nearest rubbish bin. Take 3 for the Wear!

But please be careful of broken glass, needles etc. 

Thank you.